Saturday, October 30, 2004 4:29 AM

In a piece on Beliefnet.com, the leading multifaith religion website, Sen. John Kerry’s campaign said the candidate supported legislation to ban abortions after fetuses are “viable.” Such a proposal could ban roughly

10,000 abortions a year.

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/155/story_15523_1.html

The article states:

John Kerry’s Abortion Ban

The campaign confirms that Kerry supports a measure that could ban thousands of abortions

By Steve Waldman

Sen. John Kerry supports banning most abortions of fetuses post “viability,” the campaign confirmed

Thursday.

Roughly 10,000 abortions occur each year in the third trimester, after fetuses are commonly thought to be

viable, so this approach could curtail a greater number of late term abortions than the “partial birth

abortion” ban often discussed by President Bush.

In 1997, when Congress was first considering whether to prohibit partial birth abortion, Democratic Sen. Tom

Daschle of South Dakota offered a compromise amendment that banned abortion for any fetuses that could be

considered viable. [Text here]. Kerry voted for the amendment, which was defeated by an alliance of

Republicans and liberal Democrats. [Click here for roll call.]

Kerry has never mentioned his support of such a ban in any major speeches, debates or campaign documents and

usually emphasizes a woman’s “right to choose.” However, in response to questions from Beliefnet concerning

the 1997 vote, campaign spokesman Jin Chon, emailed Thursday, “John Kerry stands by his vote.”

The Daschle amendment stated: “It shall be unlawful for a physician to abort a viable fetus unless the

physician certifies that the continuation of the pregnancy would threaten the mother’s life or risk grievous

injury to her physical health.”

At the time Daschle proposed his amendment, also called the “comprehensive abortion ban act of 1997,” the

American Civil Liberties Union attacked it as “unconstitutionally narrow” because it didn’t allow enough

health-of-the-mother exceptions. The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League president Kate

Michelman said Daschle’s amendment “goes too far” in restricting abortion.

Republicans opposed the Daschle amendment too, arguing that it gave too much authority to doctors to determine

“viability.”

Though President Bush has spoken in general about the need to “protect life” — and the Republican platform

calls for a constitutional amendment banning most abortion — it is the partial birth ban he mentions most

often. There has been much debate about the actual number of late term partial birth abortions, with most

estimates ranging from a few hundred to 1,500. The ban signed by President Bush did not affect other kinds of

late term abortions.

Medical conventional wisdom holds that fetuses generally become viable – able to live outside the womb – by

the beginning of seventh month of pregnancy. The Alan Guttmacher Institute has estimated that .08% of

abortions, or about 10,000, occur after the 24th week. The Daschle bill also would have prohibited any

“partial birth” abortions on fetuses that were viable.

The Bush campaign has criticized Kerry’s votes against the partial birth ban and the Bush-Cheney campaign’s

official website notes several other examples of Senator Kerry opposing restrictions on abortion. As a result

of his pro-choice record, several Catholic bishops have said that voting for Kerry is a sin.

The Church’s position — and the Kerry campaign’s statement — may be significant because several

battlegrounds states have large Catholic populations: Pennsylvania (30%), New Jersey (45.9%), Ohio (28%),

Michigan (28%), Wisconsin (34.4), Minnesota (28.7%) and New Hampshire (38.2%).

The 1997 fight created some unusual alliances. Two pro-life academics Stephen C. Meyer and David K. DeWolf

wrote in the Wall Street Journal at the time that the Daschle amendment would have stopped more than 10,000

abortions each year. The writers declared, “For Americans who want to limit abortion on demand, a historic

opportunity stands open in Congress. Whether pro-life legislators seize this opportunity will depend on

whether they prefer symbolic victory or substantive reform.”

Several pro-choice groups opposed the approach. In a letter opposing the amendment, the ACLU stated at the

time that the ban would “would prevent women with serious and legitimate health problems from obtaining the

abortions they need.”

On the other hand, Republicans argued that because the determination of “grievous injury” and fetal viability

would be left to the physician, the ban would have been toothless. “If we pass the Daschle amendment and

require this concept of physician certification, that the pregnancy would risk grievous injury, I believe that

clearly would render this bill meaningless,” said Senator Mike Dewine, a Ohio Republican. Senator Rick

Santorum of Pennsylvania declared, “Put yourself in the position of the abortionist. Are you going to say the

baby was viable and I killed it?”

In an article about the 1997 battle, former Daschle aide Amy Sullivan recalled that “the Alternative was never

so popular as in defeat. Leading conservatives immediately scolded Republicans for missing their last best

chance to cooperate with Democrats on abortion legislation, recognizing that the Alternative would have been a

big step toward reducing abortion rates. ‘You can’t be so used to drubbing your enemy that you don’t recognize

it when they make some sense,’ William Bennett told The Washington Times. ‘If I didn’t know who sponsored

this, I would have thought it was a pro-life Republican.’”

The timing of the Kerry campaign’s brief statement may relate to the phase of the campaign. In a panel on

religion and politics during the Democratic convention, Sean Casey, a professor at Wesley Theological

Seminary, speculated that early in the campaign season, Democratic candidates highlight only their

most-pro-choice positions because “there’s so much early pro-choice money in the Democratic Party.”

Now that the campaigns have progressed past the fundraising period and into the vote-gathering period, the

calculus may have shifted for the Kerry campaign.

Related Articles:

• Greece: can you believe this/them?
• Syria February 2012: Two Perspectives
• EGYPT: THE GROSS INSECURITY OF THE DHIMMI
• Female Circumcision in the Maldives, the Islamic Movement and Islamophobia
• Australia Day message

This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License.