From a N T theologian-friend:
Thank you for the discussion on ways of understanding the death of Jesus.
I’ve found it a helpful to talk of four basic paradigms for thinking of the implications of Jesus’ death and resurrection: sacrificial, legal, victory and discipleship ‘models’ of ‘at-one-ment’ (which I understand was William Tyndale’s invented word for translating katallassw/katallage, or reconciliation).
I know we evangelicals have tended to think of discipleship as that which follows ‘being saved’, rather than part of the same ongoing event — but I think we’re learning that it’s not helpful to separate ‘faith’ and ‘works’ (as if it were ever possible).
Related Articles:
- THE NEW EVANGELICALS: HOW CHRISTIANS ARE RETHINKING ABORTION AND GAY MARRIAGE
- Theologians, like parents, are invited to be humble as well as (frequently) ignorant…
- The Jesus Driven Life
- INCARNATION
- Virgin Birth: ‘God degraded Mary?’

This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License.











Discussion
No comments for “Paradigms of the Atonement”