Matthew 5:17-48
"The world is too much with us, getting and spending, we lay
waste our powers," so wrote the famous English poet William
Wordsworth many years ago. At the risk of appearing presumptuous,
I would like to disagree. I do not think that the main problem is
that the world is too much with us but rather that we are too
much with ourselves.
The American poet e. e. cummings would never capitalize the
letter "I" in part to protest against this domination of the
individual ego. We are the problem, not something out there. But
the "I" which dwells within. A young boy at an October football
game sat on his hands in order to keep them warm but when he went
to move them he couldn't, they had gone to sleep on him. And so
he complained to his mother, "I can't get myself off of my
hands."
This is the problem that we all face. We see life through
our own perspective. We interpret the actions of others in light
of how it affects us. We cannot get ourselves off of our hands!
That is why when you're feeling down often the very best thing
that you can do is try to help somebody else. Because, as you
help someone else your problems suddenly don't seem as important
as they used to, nor as insurmountable either.
It is the fact, that we are too often preoccupied with
ourselves, imprisoned by our own egos, which provides the
necessary clue to help us understand this morning's gospel
reading and, in particular, Christ's comment to "be perfect, . ..,
as your Heavenly Father is perfect." As one biblical scholar
puts it, Matthew 5:17-48 has to be one of the most difficult and
puzzling of all Christ's sayings. The reason why as fairly
simple. Throughout the gospels we see Jesus constantly breaking
or reinterpreting the Jewish law in favour of the needs of
individuals, as summarized by Jesus's comment, "the Sabbath was
made for man and not man for the Sabbath." Why then, in Matthew
5:17-48, does Jesus seem to say the opposite? Indeed, when you
read this passage Jesus seems to be out-legalizing the actions of
any Pharisee who ever lived. Not only are you not to commit
adultery but you cannot even think a lustful thought. And if
you do then pluck out your eyeball because it is better to enter
the kingdom of heaven maimed then to perish in the fires of hell!
Throughout the Middle East, at sites deemed to be holy by
the Muslim people, you will find blind beggars with red and white
hats begging for money. These are not just any beggars. They are
special beggars, given the privilege of begging at the holy sites
because they have been to Mecca: having seen the most
wonderful sight there is to see in the world, they have plucked
out their eyeballs, blinded themselves, so that the last sight
they will ever see in this life is the Black Rock of Mecca. Is
this really what Jesus wanted us to do? If we looked at a picture
of Cindy Crawford or Patrick Swayze to pluck out our eyeballs if
there was even the slightest stirrings of desire within us?
The answer is `no,' Jesus was not trying to out-legalize the
Pharisees. This was not his intention at all. That is not
say that Jesus didn't care about the claims of the law, either. I
need to make this point quite clearly because throughout history
there have been Christians who have claimed that since they were saved
by grace and not by the law, then the claims of the law could be
disregarded by them; they were above the law, so to speak.
You find this attitude being attacked by the apostle Paul
when he writes to the Christians gathered together at Rome as he
asks this hypothetical question, "are we to continue to sin that
grace, may abound?" And then Paul thunders out his answer,"by no
means.
St. Augustine once said that the guide for Christian
behavior could be summed up with this saying, "love God and do what
you please," which, at first glance, appears to be a very dangerous
comment to make. "You mean to say as long as I love God, I can do what I
want to, anything I want to?" "Yes," Augustine would reply, "but if
you love God do you really want to do that which is wrong, hurtful
to God and harmful to others?
Jesus respected the law and thought, as did the apostle
Paul, that it had a very important role to play. So please don't
interpret what I have to say as justification for ignoring the
law. But the point still remains that although on the surface it
looks as if in Matthew 5:17-48, Jesus was creating simply a
harder version of the law, he was really doing something very
different. He was trying to attack and to find a solution to this
perplexing problem that we are too much with ourselves, that we
cannot get ourselves off of our own hands.
I probably have you a bit confused at this point, so let me
try to explain. When you focus on keeping the law you end up
focusing on yourself, the big "I" of the ego becomes even more of
a problem than it already is. Either you think that you have
achieved the demands of the law and you are smugly self righteous
and full of pride or, more likely, you fall short of the law's
demands and feel that you are a miserable, sinful wretch. But
either way you end up focusing on yourself, on your goodness or your
badness. That is why Jesus prefaced each of his comments by this
phrase, "you have heard it said, but I say unto you.' That is why
the summary of what we are to do is to look to God and seek to be
like God. Because, you see, what Jesus is telling us is this,
"don't worry about yourself but about God, try to be one with
God, and you will find that the problem of the ego, of the self,
the big "I" becomes much less of a problem."
A football player went into the big game wanting to play his
very best. He was determined not to make any mistakes and to do
everything right. You know what happened, don't you?. He was so
focused on not making any mistakes that he played a wooden,
uninspired game. When the ball was passed to him, he fumbled it.
When the openings were there he failed to take them because he
was too worried he would do something wrong.
At the half he sat in the dressing room, head down,
convinced that the coach would pull him. Instead, the coach said
nothing to him at all, he talked about how much fun it was to
play football, about the joy of it all. And then before the
second half began he called out the starter's names and the
player was on the list! That player went out there that second
half and he forgot about himself, about not making any mistakes,
about having a perfect game. All he wanted to do was to please
the coach for showing confidence in him. He played the very best
game of his football career. He played better than he had ever
played before. He played like a man inspired. Because, you see,
he wasn't thinking about pleasing himself, but about pleasing his
coach and about how much fun it was simply to play the game.
As the old hymn puts it, "turn your eyes upon Jesus look
full in his wonderful face, and the things of earth will grow
strangely dim in the light of his glory and grace." When Peter
saw Jesus walking to him on the waters, Peter immediately jumped
out of the boat to meet him. Suddenly, he became self conscious.
The "I" of the ego reared its head. He thought to himself "what
am I doing here? I'm going to drown!" And immediately as he took
his eyes and his attention off of Jesus, Peter began to sink.
Perfection doesn't mean meeting all the requirements of the
law, it means directing your attention towards God, towards
knowing God and being like God. As the hymn writer puts it, "come
near and bless us when we wake, Ere through the world our way we
take. Till, in the ocean of Thy love, We lose ourselves in heaven
above." That's what perfection really means, it means being so
immersed in the contemplation of God and God's love that we lose
ourselves and so find the heaven that is not only above, but
within as well.
Karl Rahner, the great Roman Catholic theologian, once put
it like this, "the Christian of the future," he stated "must be a
mystic or he or she will be nothing." If true, and I believe that
it is, this is rather unsettling statement for us as Protestants
and even more so as Baptists. We are used to being activists, to
seeking to do the will of God. A few of us move on to being
theologians, to trying to understand and reason out our faith,
but we veer away from being mystics. It smacks of the exotic and
the bizarre. Long haired, bearded, wild-eyed individuals come to
mind. We don't have the rich tradition of the Roman Catholic
Church. we don't know how to meditate, how to be still, how to be
lost in the contemplation of the divine.
We are going to have to learn how. Our society has been so
permeated with the claims of the Judaeo-Christian faith, that
ethical behavior is almost as common outside the walls of the
church as it is inside. People are cultural Christians. They may
have lost the reason why but they still do the right thing
anyway. And while in the end, I cannot help thinking that this
is like building a house on sand, nonetheless, in the meantime
their behavior, their lifestyle is a Christian one.
When I was a boy in the country of Bolivia I caught a lizard
by the tail. I didn't know at the time but I soon found out that
one of the defense mechanisms of that type of lizard was to be
able to separate itself from its tail and to run away to safety
I didn't capture the lizard, then, and he scurried off to safety
but I did have his tail. I held it in my hand as it writhed and
moved about for what seemed like eternity. It was the strangest
thing. I knew it was dead, but still it seemed to be alive, as if
it were still attached to the lizard!
It is the same way with our Canadian society. The tail of
ethical behavior has been separated from the body of Judaeo-
Christian faith. In time the tail will stop moving, loose its
ethical action, but in the meantime, it still appears for all
intents and purposes to be attached to the body. You don't need
to be a Christian, you don't need to go to church, in order to do
what is right. From birth Canadians are taught what is right. And
even if they have absolutely no Christian faith whatsoever, and
think of God on the same level as the Easter Bunny or Santa
Claus, nonetheless they follow God's laws and are for the most
part, obedient to God's commandments. If you count on ethical
action to lead you, to lead others to a contemplation of God then
you will be disappointed.
In a similar way, the link between reason and the existence
of God has also been cut. Relativism has given birth, in due
course, to decontructionism. There is no truth any longer,
everything is relative. Before deconstructionist philosophy took
hold this meant that everything was equally true, now it means that
everything is equally false.
Of course this process of separating reason from faith has a
much longer history than that. It can be traced back to the
writings of Immanuel Kant who taught that the finite mind of man
cannot comprehend the infinite existence of God. And so,
according to Kant, the only path open to the human creature was
ethical action. But we have seen what has happened to that
pathway. Christianity in Canada has been killed by its own
success!
Kant was wrong, though. Not in his analysis of the
limitations of reason. In that unfortunately he was correct. But
he was wrong in teaching that ethics was the only pathway left
open to God, to knowing that God exists, to serving God, to being
one with God. There is another pathway, there always has been,
although it has been walked on by very few people over the years
and the centuries, but it is the pathway which we must tread in
the future if we want to retain and to grow in faith. Moreover,
it is, in the end, the only pathway which will really lead you to
that perfection which Christ called for.
"The Christian of the future," said Rahner, "must be a
mystic or he or she will be nothing." The pathway that we must
learn to walk upon is the pathway of mysticism. It is the pathway
not of doing the will of God, nor of understanding the mind of
God, but the pathway of losing oneself in the contemplation of
God.
How, in heaven's name, can we activistic, rationalistic
Westerners ever learn to walk on this pathway? That is a good
question and I really don't have time to answer it this morning.
As the little poem puts it, "roses are red, violets are blue,
hold on for ten minutes and I'll soon be through." But I don't
even have ten minutes do I? My time is almost up. So very, very
quickly let me offer these suggestions:
Firstly, we must learn, as the psalmist put it, "to be still
and to know that God is God." The hurried rushed lifestyle
of the average Canadian is inadequate. From time to time
You must learn how to be still, how to listen to that voice
which speaks in the quietness, that still small voice, which
is the voice of God.
Secondly, we must learn to empty ourselves, to surrender up
to God all our goodness, our morality, our wisdom, our
achievements. We must learn to become little children once
again.
Thirdly, we must learn to become poets and artists, to go
deep inside of ourselves and find that creative language
which we knew before we became educated. We must plumb the
depths of our beings and learn as John Donne once put it,
"that the heart has its reasons, of which reason knows
nothing."
And fourthly, we must learn how to listen, to really listen.
We must learn how to see, to really see. Not just to listen
with the ears of the flesh, nor to see with the eyes of the
head, but to listen and to see with the eyes and the ears of
the spirit.
Let me close with two comments. The first is by the American
naturalist and poet Walt Whitman, who after attending a rather
dry and boring academic lecture on astronomy wrote these words:
When I heard the astronomer where he lectured
with much applause in the lecture-room,
How soon accountable I became tired and sick,
Til rising and gliding out I wander'd off by myself,
In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,
Look'd up in perfect silence at the stars.
The second is by a musician named Ariel who one morning heard a
brass band playing under his window. The music moved him almost
to tears;
May the beauty of nature, of music and of poetry lead you
beyond yourself to a contemplation of God. May you lose yourself
in the contemplation of God's love and so find the perfection for
which you were intended -- the perfection which is heaven.
delivered at the Pereaux Church
11 February 1996
© 1996 Mark Parent. All rights reserved.
It exercised an indefinable, nostalgic power over me [he
wrote]; it set me dreaming of another world, of infinite
passion and supreme happiness. Such impressions are the
echoes of Paradise in the soul; memories of ideal spheres,
whose sweet sadness ravishes and intoxicates the heart. If
music thus carries us to heaven [Ariel concludes], it is
because music is harmony, harmony is perfection, perfection
is our dream, and our dream is heaven.
top of page