Articles
new articles
section catalog
keyword catalog
title catalog
author catalog
Google

Devotion


Character Matters!

Clergy/Leaders' Mail-list No. 782 (Movies - Moderate length)

This appeared in ALL ABOUT FAMILIES (Norman Bales, Editor)

CHARACTER MATTERS IN LOVE TOO

By Joel Mark Solliday

How does one "fall in love?" Is it biological or behavioral? Is it learned behavior or learning behavior? I suppose it is both. I'm still confused.

You logic lovers who dislike the word "fall" in this context could be next. maybe. Then your critical analysis of the term will be lost in cyber-space forever. Let others quarrel with the words. I just want to know how it's done. I can worry about the long climb back up to planet earth later. Maybe the movies can shed some light on the subject.

Apparently, people fall in love on line. The movie, "You've Got Mail" built its plot on that brilliant proposition. Such "love" is not really learned or learning behavior. It is just strange behavior. Yet it's fun to watch others pretend to do it.

My friends and I thought this film was cute, at first. Then our minds embarked on a brief debriefing exercise, led by me I must admit. If pretense, deception, selfishness and sexual indiscretion are cute, then "You've Got Mail" is too.

Movies, like commercials, are not benign. They tamper with our desires and values. They even teach us how to "fall" in love. Movies move images. Images move hearts. I know you are immune but indulge me for the sake of all the other mindless zombies.

Boycotting movies is not my point. Debriefing is. Don't be a mindless zombie. Be a critical thinker, not a critical person. And watch for the following creative device used by the Tom Hankses and Meg Ryans of the big screen: they lie to win love.

So that's how it's done. In "Sleepless in Seattle," the female was the liar. In "You've Got Mail," it was the male. He was no gentleman. He intentionally stood up the heroine (for non-heroic reasons) and the audience still swooned. We knew the heroine would swoon soon too. I guess electronic lies don't count.

Is dishonesty sexy? The Hanks character won his woman with pure pretense as sighs filled the auditorium. He deceived his on-line pal and played the classic two-faced role, all to his advantage at her emotional expense. He was also a cutthroat businessman but we all just knew he had a soft spot somewhere and Meg would find it.

And another thing. Hollywood seems to think that the best way to "fall in love" is to be sleeping with someone you don't love until the right one comes along and makes it all right. The sheets hardly get cold. The ones dumped don't seem to mind (remember the fiancé in "Sleepless" left high and dry at the restaurant with his mouth full and heart empty?). This technique minimizes the moral outrage over the cruel secret the star kept hidden until the opportune moment. For Hollywood, apparently, love is a pretty low place to fall.

Disney has been teaching girls for years that the boy next door is chopped liver. You need a handsome stranger for the right feeling-be he a prince or a monstrous beast. At least he's a stranger, not a friend. "You've Got Mail," like "Sleepless" fits this formula.

Is this what women want? In the movie "As Good As it Gets," another beautiful woman falls for a guy unworthy of her. The Nicholson character was unfit for any romance. He was surly, mean-spirited, selfish and obsessive-compulsive. Yet, Helen Hunt is swept off her feet, in time. Does the phrase "fit for romance" mean anything out there?

"Have a heart," you say. He had a psychological problem and needed attention and help. Plus he paid her son's medical expenses. OK, let your daughter marry such a cad.

Hollywood is sending the wrong messages. Imagine that. One is that women fall for men who lie. But then, why bring politics in?

- Joel Solliday <>


Also -

Morality Is Not Democratic

Throughout the entire debate concerning the president's behavior, the media has regularly kept us abreast of the president's approval ratings in the polls. Can you decide questions of right and wrong on the basis of public opinion? What are the criteria for determining one's ethical standards? This is the subject of an essay by Monroe Hawley at <http://www.allaboutfamilies.org/sh/percep2.html>


If you wish to subscribe to All About Families, send a message to with the Subject line SUBSCRIBE FAMILY.

E-mail:

Web: http://www.allaboutfamilies.org/family/



top of page