For this is the will of God, your sanctification:
that you abstain from fornication; that each one of you know how
to control your own body in holiness and honor, not with lustful
passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God; that no one wrong
or exploit a brother or sister in this matter, because the Lord
is an avenger in all these things, just as we have already told
you beforehand and solemnly warned you. For God did not call us
to impurity but in holiness. (1 Thessalonians 4:3-7) Let marriage
be held in honor by all, and let the marriage bed be kept undefiled;
for God will judge fornicators and adulterers. (Hebrews 13:4)
But because of cases of sexual immorality, each man should have
his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should
give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to
her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own
body, but the husband does; likewise the husband does not have
authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive
one another except perhaps by agreement for a set time, to devote
yourselves to prayer, and then come together again, so that Satan
may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. (1 Corinthians
7:2-5)
For thus said the Lord God, the Holy One of Israel:
In returning and rest you shall be saved; in quietness and in
trust shall be your strength. (Isaiah 30:15)
The eye cannot say to the hand, 'I have no need
of you,' nor again the head to the feet, 'I have no need of you.'
(1 Corinthians 12:21)
And though one might prevail against another, two
will withstand one. A threefold cord is not quickly broken. (Ecclesiastes
4:12)
.....
A couple wanted a quiet wedding, so the pastor agreed
to have it in the manse. One matter however was overlooked. At
the precise moment the question was asked 'Do you take this man
to be your lawful wedded husband?' a voice came from the clock
behind them, 'Cuckoo! cuckoo...!' Seven times! The bride never
did quite regain her composure. Some brides and bridegrooms never
do.
A cynic said, 'Marriage is an institution, but who
wants to spend their lives in an institution?' Marriages are held
together by mutual service, a lot of patience, giving the benefit
of the doubt, and by the gifts of apology and forgiveness. All
of which isn't easy. Here are ten common misunderstandings about
marriage which surface in my counseling room:
1. 'PEOPLE MARRY BECAUSE THEY LOVE EACH OTHER.'
In Western cultures we 'fall in love' then marry. In other societies
you marry, then learn to 'love' your mate. 'Realistic love' is
measured by the degree to which the satisfaction or the security
of the other person becomes as significant as one's own satisfaction
or security. 'Romantic love' is quite different - it's a mix
of psychosexual or biochemical drives, plus a hunger for nurture
and approval, and the almost mystical experience of eliminating
psychic boundaries with another. Surprisingly some marriages
are strong even if the couple are not 'in love': they may have
a shared companionship and contentment that is mutually satisfying.
True love (what I call 'realistic' love) is enhanced
in the 'everydayness' of marriage, two people sharing common interests,
doing interesting things together. The flame of married love
is nurtured by kindness, consideration, adjustment to the other's
difficult habits, little surprise-gifts, and agreeing on important
values. The best marriages result from hard work: as one humorist
put it, 'Every marriage has three rings - engagement ring, wedding
ring and suffering.' Life is more than a Mills and Boon romance
or a soapie where everything ends up fine without solid hard work.
Neglect kills marriages fast so plan ways to enjoy times together.
Jan and I block out a day a week for each other, enjoying our
grandchildren, occasionally seeing a good movie, walking, eating
out, maybe just reading together, talking about 'how we are',
reviewing our goals and evaluating our relationship. We are planning
for the time when our youngest children will have left and we'll
be alone. We'll then have maybe twenty or thirty years (nearly
half our married life) 'for better, for worse, and for lunch'!
2. 'PARTNERS HELP EACH OTHER SOLVE DEEP PROBLEMS'.
If you expect your spouse to make your life right for you you'll
almost certainly be disappointed. Some expect their partner to
meet most of their needs. As we have said, it is impossible to
make another person happy. Each partner must take charge of their
own gratification and fulfilment.
Somewhere I found this wise statement: The wife's
primary responsibility is to know herself so well and to respect
herself so much, she gives herself to her husband without hesitation...
The primary responsibility of the husband is to love his Lord
so deeply and to like himself so completely, he gives himself
to his wife without hesitation... The wife's primary role is to
model true femininity... character traits that are precious to
God and impressive to her husband... The husband's role: to model
genuine masculinity... unselfish and sensitive leadership that
strengthens the home and gives dignity to the wife.
3. 'IN HAPPY MARRIAGES THEY DO EVERYTHING TOGETHER'.
In a good marriage maybe they do 70-80% of their leisure activities
together but there is room for individual growth and privacy as
well.
4. 'TRUE LOVERS CAN READ EACH OTHER'S THOUGHTS'.
This is a half-truth and it's a problem particularly in the sexual
area: 'If my partner understood me he/she would soon find out
what satisfies me.' One cannot automatically experience another's
feelings: don't expect your spouse to read your mind or your body:
teach him/her! But 'you'll never understand the opposite sex
so don't try' is too pessimistic. Males and females have more
in common than they might realize: our humanness, giving and receiving
love, the desire to be appreciated, the need for respect and honour
are shared by the sexes. Should marriage partners 'tell each
other everything'? Counselors are divided on this one. Some I
counsel are working through issues of impure thinking (perhaps
relating to pornography, sado-masochism etc.) but feel that their
naive wives would probably not understand. If I were pressed I'd
say 99.5% can be shared. Perhaps there are rare exceptions, motivated
by love and integrity rather than deceit. Should married partners
say what they think when they think it? Not necessarily. Sometimes
critical feedback may be destructive if not couched in love and
bathed in prayer. You do not have a right to 'let it all hang
out'. Attacks may generate counter-attacks - or 'passive aggressive'
responses where the other becomes a saboteur. Sometimes it's important
to think of things far enough ahead not to say them.
5. 'HE/SHE'LL CHANGE AFTER WE'RE MARRIED.' Not necessarily;
in fact, not likely! As the saying goes, lots of girls would make
better wives if they weren't trying to make better husbands (and
vice versa). Disagreements do not necessarily mean a poor marriage.
On the contrary in almost all cases when people say 'We've never
had a disagreement throughout our married lives' I'm suspicious.
Sometimes that's a sign of a sick marriage. If one wants the in-laws
to share holidays and the other doesn't, then that's OK. Some
compromise will be necessary. If a concert would be exciting to
one and utterly boring for the other, again you'll need 'plan
B'!. A good marriage survives these episodes.
6. 'IF THE MAN IS A GOOD PROVIDER, THAT'S THE MAIN
THING.' Many men think they can show their love by working, earning
and spending. They are hurt when their hard efforts to bring
hbome the bacon and pay the bills aren't appreciated. But women
would prefer men who listen and resonate with their feelings.
Even the Beatles knew that 'money can't buy me love'. Orange
County in California USA has about the highest per capita income
in the world but its divorce rate is over 70%.
7. 'CHILDREN WILL MAKE OUR MARRIAGE BETTER.' If
the marriage isn't happy, the coming of children won't fix that.
All you'll have now is an unhappy marriage plus a baby. The psychological
and financial expenditure caring for a child often exacerbates
the tensions between the couple. By the way, read some books
or attend some seminars on parenting before and during the time
children are around! (It's sad that church-sponsored seminars
on 'fathering' generally are a fizzer.) Discuss how many children
you want and when, how they will be brought up, who will stay
at home when they are young.
8. 'AN AFFAIR AUTOMATICALLY SPELLS THE END OF THE
MARRIAGE.' Not necessarily. But the line 'a little adultery never
hurt a strong marriage' is not true either: the 1960s 'open marriages'
were found to be a deeply flawed idea. Adultery is forbidden
in the ten commandments not because a law-giving God doesn't want
us to enjoy ourselves, but because humans need a context of fidelity
and love to fulfil their God-endowed potential.
In the film Indecent Proposal a rich gambler offers
$1 million to a desperately poor couple in exchange for a night
with the wife (played by Demi Moore). Even in our freer culture,
there is still a widespread sensitivity to infidelity. Of course
'playing around' happens without million-dollar incentives...
If possible, when you discover that your partner
has been carrying on with someone else (1) Stay calm; (2) Feel
betrayed - even mad - but condemn the behaviour rather than the
person; (3) Don't even think about revenge: ask why the marriage
allowed this to happen?; (4) Don't worry if you can't forgive
your partner immediately. That's normal. Forgiveness will come
later (if it never comes I'd be worried); (5) Find a counselor
and seek therapy. An 'affair' need not be the end of the marriage:
but some new, honest negotiating will be necessary to get the
marriage onto a secure foundation again.
The problem with infidelity is in the meaning of
that word: one is participating in a lie. The loss of honesty
and the spinning of a web of deception destroys loving trust.
Even so-called 'harmless flirting' cheapens the relationship and
is a sign of disrespect: that habit should be broken.
9. 'IT'S BETTER TO HANG ON IN A DESTRUCTIVE MARRIAGE.'
Again, not necessarily. While God hates divorce, God is not a
legalist either. I have counseled women married to psychopaths
where everyone was being destroyed, and, yes, had to agree after
many bashings and the children being traumatized that the lesser
of all evils was to leave the perpetrator of violence. In less
destructive situations sometimes the shock tactic of a trial separation
may be called for, but only, I feel, as a last resort after all
else has failed, and only with the guidance of a skilled counselor.
10. 'CHRISTIAN COUPLES SHOULD PRAY TOGETHER.' Yes,
maybe, but usually they don't. One usually prays 'better' than
the other, and because we inhabit a sick competitive culture and
forget we should pray to our Father as a child would, and we get
embarrassed about our poor flow of words. So I frankly don't know
what 'better' means. If you 'pray as you can, not as you can't'
and we respect each other's uniqueness it should be possible to
pray meaningfully together. Probably there's a deeper reason,
however. Praying couples soon find that integrity is called for
if the prayer is not phony. God looks on the heart. He understands
our deepest motives. Unless the marriage relationship is utterly
transparent, praying becomes a form of ritualized verbosity.
(The Still Waters Deep Waters series of devotional books are now
being used by many couples in their joint prayer-times.) How often
should you pray together? As often as you like. Maybe pray separately
in the mornings and together at night, or vice versa. You may
choose to share your own personal prayer journey with your partner.
.....
We learn about marriage from our parents, the media,
from married friends, or from marriage enrichment courses. But
learning from your parents can be hazardous, if their marriage
wasn't good. Well-known Australian 'biker' evangelist John Smith
asked a few hundred schoolkids, 'How many of you would marry if
you knew your marriage would be about as good as your parents'?'
Only six or seven said yes. So the others will have to learn
about marriage from somewhere else...
If they're going to learn from TV or the movies,
then they'd better ask: 'What values is Hollywood portraying?
Is love ever more than sexual attraction or temporary emotion?
Were deep commitment, faithfulness, unselfishness and respect
to one another part of the plot?' Sometime analyse the songs about
love on the radio: probably 90% will say 'I need you baby... I
can't live without you... Hold me tight... set me alight...'
or whatever. Most will be about romantic love rather than realistic
love.
Rowland Croucher, from an unpublished sermon.
Love at first sight is a physical and emotional
impossibility. Why? Because love is not simply a feeling of romantic
excitement; it goes beyond intense sexual attraction; it exceeds
the thrill at having 'captured' a highly desirable social prize.
These are emotions that are unleashed at first sight, but they
do not constitute love. I wish the whole world knew that fact.
These temporary feelings differ from love in that they place the
spotlight on the one experiencing them. 'What is happening to
Me? This is the most fantastic thing I've ever been through! I
think I am in love!' You see, these emotions are selfish in the
sense that they are motivated by our own gratification. They have
little to do with the new lover. Such a person has not fallen
in love with another person; he or she has fallen in love with
love!
...Real love, in contrast to popular notions, is
an expression of the deepest appreciation for another human being;
it is an intense awareness of his or her needs and longings for
the past, present and future. It is unselfish and giving and caring.
James Dobson, Emotions - Can You Trust Them?, London:
Hodder & Stoughton, 1980, pp.55-57. [189]
Romantic love is the single greatest energy system
in the Western psyche. In our culture it has supplanted religion
as the arena in which men and women seek meaning, transcendence,
wholeness, and ecstasy. As a mass phenomenon, romantic love is
peculiar to the West. We are so accustomed to living with the
beliefs and assumptions of romantic love that we think it is the
only form of 'love' on which marriage or love relationships can
be based. We think it is the only 'true love'. But... in Eastern
cultures, like those of India or Japan, we find that married couples
love each other with great warmth, often with a stability and
devotion that puts us to shame. But their love is not 'romantic
love' as we know it. They don't impose the same ideals on their
relationships, nor do they impose such impossible demands and
expectations on each other as we do... For romantic love doesn't
just mean loving someone; it means being 'in love'. This is a
psychological phenomenon that is very specific. When we are 'in
love' we believe we have found the ultimate meaning of life, revealed
in another human being. We feel we are finally completed, that
we have found the missing parts of ourselves. Life suddenly seems
to have a wholeness, a super-human intensity that lifts us high
above the ordinary pain of existence. For us, these are the sure
signs of 'true love'. The psychological package includes an unconscious demand that our lover or spouse always provide us with this feeling
of ecstasy and intensity. With typical Western self-righteousness
we assume that our notion of 'love', romantic love, must be the
best. We assume that any other kind of love between couples would
be cold and insignificant by comparison. But if we Westerners
are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that our approach
to romantic love is not working well.
Despite our ecstasy when we are 'in love', we spend
much of our time with a deep sense of loneliness, alienation,
and frustration over our inability to make genuinely loving and
committed relationships. Usually we blame other people for failing
us; it doesn't occur to us that perhaps it is we who need to change
our unconscious attitudes - the expectations and demands we impose
on our relationships and on other people.
Robert A. Johnson, The Psychology Of Romantic Love,
London: Arkana, 1983, pp.xi,xii. [390]
Christian marriage counselors usually define love
more in terms of actions and decisions than feelings. We know
God's love because he did something, not because he felt something.
We are exhorted to love our spouses whether we feel like it or
not. People who report that they no longer love their mates are
urged to engage in a series of loving behaviors with the implicit
promise that feelings will follow. The correct assumption behind
this thinking is that the truth of God's Word is to be the basis
for our actions. We are not to be led by our erratic emotions,
but are to follow biblical instruction whether our feelings agree
or rebel.
Larry Crabb, The Marriage Builder, Homebush West,
N.S.W.: ANZEA, 1992, p.113. [113]
People fall in love, but they decide to stay in
love. Emotions change like the weather, but love must be a determined
commitment. 'Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved
the church' (Ephesians 5:25). 'Encourage the young women to love
their husbands' (Titus 2:4). We must commit to love in a self-sacrificial
way whether or not the love is reciprocated.
Jerry White, The Power of Commitment, Colorado Springs,
Colorado: NavPress, 1985, p.88. [61]
Whilst it is true that he condemned hypocrisy, I
have never been able to find even one instance in the New Testament
in which Jesus bludgeoned someone into the kingdom of heaven by
threats or bitter denunciations of their sinfulness. Perhaps it
is time that the church reconsidered its position and tried things
his way...
The Bible... makes it plain that God hates divorce,
that is, he hates to see families broken up...
[But] when all [the] factors are balanced it is
clear that the increase in the incidence of divorce is largely
a symptom of serious underlying problems. The church would be
far more effective if it sought to address those problems rather
than simply making sweeping and condemnatory statements. Of course
there are irresponsible and selfish people who betray their marriage
vows without a qualm. Some of them may be found in our churches.
Such people should be censured, though I would suggest privately
rather than from the pulpit. But it is time the church recognised
that such people are in the minority. Most of the divorced and
separated people in our churches are among the ranks of the hurt
and ashamed. They do not need intemperate diatribes to bring home
to them a consciousness of guilt; they are wracked by it. To come
to Christ with their hurt and their guilt should be a liberating
experience. Jesus came to heal the broken-hearted. We have been
entrusted with his great commission to proclaim the good news
that all may be forgiven and reconciled to their Father. Yet like
the Pharisees we so often bind heavy burdens on their shoulders
which we make little effort to help them bear...
There is an urgent need for the church to endeavour
to become the kind of caring and accepting community in which
people with broken marriages can have their wounds bound and can
receive assistance and encouragement in forging a new life. This
is a challenge which the church has largely failed to take up
or even recognise.
Ken Crispin, Divorce, The Unforgivable Sin?, Rydalmere:
Hodder & Stoughton (Australia), 1988, pp.291-294. [338]
I love you, Not only for what you are But for what
I am When I am with you.
I love you, Not only for what You have made of yourself
But for what You are making of me.
I love you, For the part of me That you bring out;
I love you, For putting your hand Into my heaped-up heart And
passing over All the foolish, weak things That you can't help
Dimly seeing there, And for drawing out Into the light All the
beautiful belongings That no one else had looked Quite far enough
to find. I love you because you Are helping me to make Of the
lumber of my life Not a tavern But a temple; Out of works Of my
every day Not a reproach But a song.
Roy Croft in Charles Swindoll, Growing Strong in
the Seasons of Life, U.S.A.: Multnomah Press, 1983, pp.67-68.
[135]
O the comfort, The inexpressible comfort, Of feeling
safe with a person, Neither having to weigh thoughts Nor measure
words... but pouring Them all right out, just as they are, Chaff
and grain together... Certain that a faithful hand will Take
and sift them, Keep what is worth keeping... And with a breath
of kindness Blow the rest away.
Source unknown
Codependency is a compulsion to control and rescue
people by fixing their problems. It occurs when a person's God-given
needs for love and security have been blocked in a relationship
with a dysfunctional person, resulting in a lack of objectivity,
a warped sense of responsibility, being controlled and controlling
others (three primary characteristics); and in hurt and anger,
guilt, and loneliness (three corollary characteristics). These
characteristics affect the codependent's every relationship and
desire. His goal in life is to avoid the pain of being unloved
and to find ways to prove that he is lovable. It is a desperate
quest.
Pat Springle, Rapha's 12-Step Program for Overcoming
Codependency, Dallas TX: WORD Inc., 1990, p.XIII. [101]
It goes without saying that in marriage, two wills
are in operation at the same time. Sometimes, and especially in
the early months of the marriage, the two wills are spontaneously
congruent, and experienced as one. But as time goes by and early
ecstasies are succeeded by routines and demands, what was experienced
as a gift must be developed as an art. The art is willed passivity...
Learning the art of willed passivity begins with appreciating
the large and creative part passivity plays in our lives. By far
the largest part of our life is experienced in the mode of passivity.
Life is undergone. We receive. We enter into what is already there.
Our genetic system, the atmosphere, the food chain, our parents,
the dog - they are there, in place before we exercise our will...
But there are different ways of being passive: There is an indolent,
inattentive passivity that approximates the existence of a slug;
and there is a willed and attentive passivity that is something
more like worship. St. Paul's famous 'Wives be subject to your
husbands. Husbands love your wives, as Christ loved the church
and gave himself up for her' (Eph. 5:22-25) sets down the parallel
operations of willed passivity.
Eugene H. Peterson, The Contemplative Pastor: Returning
to the Art of Spiritual Direction, Carol Stream IL: Christianity
Today, Inc and Word, Inc, 1989, pp.112-114. [198]
When I married, I did not expect John to understand
me to the degree which I now expect... I find now that I want
my husband to understand all that there is to know about me. I
don't want any part of me to be hidden - even my secret hurts
and vulnerability. Armed with such understanding, I want him to
anticipate certain things which will cause me pain. But I need
to realize that such a demand is probably unrealistic - the media
have taught me first to want him to know these things and then
to expect him to know them intuitively, without my even telling
him.
Anne Townsend, Now and Forever: Christian Marriage
Today, London: Fount Paperbacks, 1986, p.36. [107]
Deep sharing is overwhelming and very rare. A thousand
fears keep us in check... the fear of breaking down, of crying;
that the other will not sense the importance with which this feeling
or memory is charged... How painful it is when such a difficult
sharing falls flat either on ears too preoccupied or mocking,
ears that in any case do not sense the tremendous significance
of what we are saying. It may happen between a man and wife. The
partner who has spoken in a very personal way without being understood
falls back into terrible emotional solitude. It is impossible
to overemphasise the immense need men have to really be listened
to, to be understood. No one can develop freely in this world
and find a full life without feeling understood by at least one
person. Misunderstood, he loses his self-confidence, he loses
his faith in life or even in God.
Paul Tournier, Marriage Difficulties, Highland Books,
1984, pp.21-22. [153]
We must respect the differences and similarities
there are between men and women so that we can each help the other
to be more fully human. Too often, in the past, the Church has
resorted to 'stereotyped roles' of men and women with little emphasis
on the similarities of being human beings made in the image of
God.
On the other hand, there is pressure in our present
culture to blur the difference completely, and thus lose the sense
of wonder and joy at the original creation intention of men and
women being made for each other - equal but different.
Richard Winter, The Roots of Sorrow, Marshall, 1984,
p.278. [278]
To encourage some people to exert their masculinity
by cutting across other people's wishes is scarcely Christian,
and is a recipe for disaster. However, where the wife respects
her husband, where the husband honours his wife, where each in
humility counts the other better than themselves, there is a basis
for respect, mutual consultation, love and unity.
Valerie Griffiths, writing in Shirley Lees (ed.),
The Role of Women, IVP, 1981, pp.70-71. [57]
The wife gives her 'self' when she gives herself
sexually. She holds nothing back, and precisely in doing this
she comes to her self-realization... Man is not nearly so deeply
stamped and moulded by his sexual experience as is the case with
the woman... Out of the centre of her nature the woman strives
to make the totality of her experience correspond with her total
submission to the man. Her goal is to make not only the physical
side of the man her own, not merely once or temporarily, but rather
to own the man's very self... Feminine sexuality... lies in the
urge towards self-realization.
Helmut Thielicke, The Ethics of Sex, James Clarke,
1978, pp.81ff. [107]
All of which means that she cannot understand this
masculine form of love, impulsive and of short duration. She would
like her husband to love her as she does him, tenderly and continually.
Such a lack of understanding can lead a wife as far as to feel
a complete disgust for sexual union. That he should wish to have
union with her when they have hardly cooled off from a heated
argument is quite impossible for her to understand.
Paul Tournier, Marriage Difficulties, Highland books,
1984, p.46. [79]
Based on an informal survey of six hundred people
who had maintained successful marriages, psychologist James Dobson
arrived at 'three tried and tested, back to basics recommendations'
for reducing the chances of divorce and for maintaining marital
stability:
* A Christ-centred home where the husband and wife
are deeply committed to Jesus Christ;
* A committed love in which nothing short of death
is permitted to come between the couple (in contrast to the idea
that 'I'll stay with you as long as I feel love for you'); and
* A never-ending willingness to work at maintaining
good communication.
People are not looking for perfect marriages, but
[for] marriages that keep working. But even these less-than-perfect
marriages have evaded many in the baby boom generation. Marital
instability has been taken for granted in this low-commitment
era, and divorce has come to be seen as a reasonable way to get
out of an unhappy marriage. As a result, the United States has
the highest divorce rate in the world.
James C. Dobson, Love For a Lifetime: Building a
Marriage that will Go the Distance, Portland: Multnomah, 1987,
pp.49-66. [131]
R.C. Sproul once said that 'If you imagined your
mother married to your father-in-law, and your father married
to your mother-in-law, you'd have a good picture of the dynamics
of your marriage.' I grew up in a home where my dad was a 'Mr.
Fix-it.' When anything broke, he fixed it. Johnny grew up in
a home where his dad wasn't interested in fixing things. It was
his mother's job to call the repairman. One of our first misunderstandings
as newlyweds was when an appliance broke. I kept hinting for Johnny
to fix it, but to no avail. Finally in a fit of exasperation,
I said, 'Why haven't you fixed it?' He responded, 'Why haven't
you called the repairman?' I must admit that in the years since,
he has become a better Mr. Fix-it, and I have called in a repairman
a few times as well!
Susan Alexander Yates, And Then I Had Kids, England:
Word (UK) Ltd, 1992, p.79. [153]
.....
A Prayer for Husbands:
Lord Jesus, gentle and strong, who related with
tenderness to woman, to children, and to the marginalized, but
also with prophetic to the enemies of God's love, give me a big
dose of gentle strength for my wife. Help me to love her as you
loved the church, a love that was willing to endure the ultimate
sacrifice of death.
Help me to meet my wife's needs for genuine affection,
for honest communication, for little surprises and common courtesies.
Help me to listen to her feelings, not merely her words; to understand
the differences between us that enrich our life together; to be
willing to accept her as she is without wanting to change her.
Help me as I look into her eyes to give her the
gift of openness, of trust, and security.
Help me to work hard to support her and the family
financially. If my earnings are inadequate give me the gift of
creativity to figure out ways of earning more or spending less.
Help me, however, to put my wife and family first.
May I be faithful in the gift of listening time, the gift of my
interested presence, and the gift of my learning and skills to
those I love.
Sometimes I feel so inadequate. I confess my sins
of neglect, of the idolatry of my vocation, of being second best
when at home. Lord forgive me. I commit myself to you, to my wife
and family. May I really believe that 'success' is unimportant
anywhere if it is not a goal of my life at home.
I pray in your strong name. Amen.
A Prayer for Wives:
Jesus, tender lover of women and children, of his
friends and the friendless, I come to you for a special gift of
love for my husband and family. Lord, help me to respect him,
not because he's perfect (you and I know he isn't), but because
he is made in your image and you have commanded wives to respect
their husbands, as you have also commanded husbands to love their
wives.
Lord, I offer to you and to him my beauty - the
beauty of a quiet, serene spirit and the beauty of my mind and
my emotions and my body. Help me to be interested in the things
he's interested in and be willing to share those interests with
him.
Help me Lord to be willing to be an excellent sexual
partner for him. Help us to talk freely about how we 'tick' so
that our sexual life will be satisfying and enjoyable.
May our home be a haven of peace in a turbulent
world, a place of quiet rest when life is too noisy and stressful.
Help me to have the grace and strength to be a secure mother
of our children; help us both to plan fun times together as a
family. Help me to be interested in my husband's work and achievements;
to be an interesting conversation- mate; and above all, help me
to pray for him, for us, and for our family regularly.
I offer my life to you Lord. May I bring joy to
you as I live in obedience to your perfect will.
Amen.
A Benediction
The riches of God's grace be upon you, that you
may live together in faith and love and receive the blessings
of eternal life. May almighty God, who creates you, redeems you
and guides you, bless you now and always. Amen.
Male and female he created them, and he blessed
them and named them 'Humankind' when they were created. (Genesis
5:2) Then the Lord God said, 'It is not good that the man should
be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner.' (Genesis 2:18)
God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply,
and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish
of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living
thing that moves upon the earth.' (Genesis 1:28)
top of page