Subject: Re: The Sinner Returns. Date: 10 Feb 1999 23:10:12 GMT From: Chris Ho-Stuart <> Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian Troy Harris <> wrote: > c) Medical science certainly does not support imputation of the soul > at birth. Rather, it generally supports life as beginning late in the > womb- hence, abortion in later stages is still illegal. > Positions such as you take merely gives them licence to murder. This is false. Scientifically speaking the definitions of life apply reasonably well. Humans -- like many other living creatures -- have a continuous life cycle which include two phases: haploid and diploid. Sperm and unfertilized eggs are living, and they are the haploid phase of our existence. After fertilization (specfically, meiosis) there is the diploid phase of our existence. All phases are certainly alive; there is no break from non-life to life in this cycle. This is essential for a useful definition, since many organisms spend the vast majority their life in a haploid phase. Those appealing to science to identify a point in development between fertilization and birth where the organism becomes alive are on dangerous ground. First, it is ignorant. There are all kinds of significant events during this development, but NONE of them constitute a break between living and non-living. Second, it avoids genuine moral discussion. The scientific definitions are not moral definitions; and we should not so elevate them. We should certainly be informed by the science for what it can reveal -- but science does not reveal what we *should* do. Third, it trivializes a very difficult question, and avoids all other dimensions of the problem -- which *are* relevant, because abortion is a question for the wider society. If some folks feel that the only significant question is whether or not the fetus is a living organism, they still need to persuade others that this is a morally responsible way to approach the issue. Cheers -- Chris Ho-Stuart
Related Articles:
- Syria February 2012: Two Perspectives
- EGYPT: THE GROSS INSECURITY OF THE DHIMMI
- Female Circumcision in the Maldives, the Islamic Movement and Islamophobia
- Australia Day message
- Republicans/Democrats: Is there a Christian Alternative?

This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License.











Discussion
No comments for “Abortion: Is The Fetus A Living Organism?”