Articles
new articles
section catalog
keyword catalog
title catalog
author catalog
Google

Leadership & Practical Theology


Fundamentalists Vs Liberals

Some Reflections


Much of the 'heat' in discussions on this newsgroup derives from two basically conflicting views of Christian reality. In my ministry as a consultant to all churches this polarization is evident everywhere. Here's a rough summary: you might like to add other categories -

GOD - Mainly judge (Fundamentalists); mainly love (Liberals)
BIBLE - Inerrant Word of God, rulebook for all of life (F's); God's message through fallible humans (L's)
GOSPEL FOR SINNERS - 'Go and sin no more' (F's); 'I do not condemn you' (L's)
EVANGELISTIC MOTIVE - Prevent souls going to hell (F's); Share God's love (L's)
HELL - Majority of humans (F's); Non-existent or non- eternal (L's)
DOUBT- Lack of faith (bad)(F's); Essential for faith (good) (L's)
AMBIGUITY - Bad (F's);Good (L's)
CHURCH - Exclusive - conform to our beliefs (F's); Inclusive: all-comers/practices welcome (L's)
DOCTRINE - Inflexible: black and white (F's); Flexible: shades of grey (L's)
ORTHODOXY: Creedal (F's); Covenantal (L's)
BIBLICAL SCHOLARSHIP - Be wary of it (F's); Welcome it (L's)
HOMOSEXUALITY - Worse than most other sins (F's); Pride, greed etc. worse (L's)
APPEALS GENERALLY TO - Less well educated (F's); Better educated (L's).

Etc etc etc

Now, I reckon there's a 'fatal flaw' in each broad position (see the article 'Was Jesus a Christian? I doubt it' in my home page).

Shalom!

Rowland Croucher



top of page