// you’re reading...

Theology

God’s Existence

From: “Rowland Croucher”

Newsgroups: aus.religion.christian

Subject: Re: The questions of existence

> “Chris Ho-Stuart” <> wrote in message

> .

> <>

Chris: reasons theists have given for

> > believing in God.

> >

> > Some have an experience which they attribute directly to God, and

> > a personal interaction with God.

Rowland: Others have similar experiences which they attribute to other

> causes/entities…

>

C: Some believe in God because they trust the witness of others (or

> > of the bible) to God’s existence.

>

R: Ditto of anything/anyone beyond our immediate senses…

>

> (The Bible BTW doesn’t set out to prove God’s existence; simply assumes

it -

> see Genesis 1:1)

> >

C: Some believe in God because they infer the existence of a creator

> > from a universe, or other phenomena.

>

R: Includes the notion of a ‘first cause’. (Why can’t there be an infinite

> regression of causes?). Nature? Wot about ‘red in tooth and claw’ – can’t

> see God there…

> >

C: I am not, in any of these threads, attempting to refute theism, or

> > God’s existence; so I am content to present the above as reasons

> > people have for belief, without needing to refute them.

> >

> > On the other hand, I do not myself believe in God, and I do not

> > in fact think any of the above is a particularly good reason for

> > belief.

>

R: I (a Christian) agree…

>

> <>

>

C: However, I am not now a Christian; I am an atheist. I don’t deny

> > my past experience; but I do attribute it to different causes.

>

R: (Raises an interesting question about whether a person is a Christian

‘cos

> they think they are; or not a Christian ‘cos they deny they are… Not

> simple).

>

> ‘Experience’ I agree is a very slippery concept – and dangerous in some

ways

> when used in Christian apologetics… As a counsellor I come across all

> kinds of persons’ ‘peak experiences’ – their aetiology is many and

> various…

>

> <>

>

> As I’ve written here before, it seems to me the best reason for believing

in

> God is proferred less frequently than any other by both theists and

> atheists – Jesus of Nazareth.

>

C: Cheers — Chris

>

R: [Sorry I can't respond more frequently to these interesting threads.

I've

> added a two-day-a-week pastorate to my already full week. But I'm

lurking].

>

> –

>

> Shalom!

>

> Rowland Croucher


Related Articles:


Creative Commons License
This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia License.

Discussion

No comments for “God’s Existence”

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Translator

English flagItalian flagPortuguese flagGerman flagFrench flagSpanish flagDutch flagNorwegian flag

Activity

Shop at Amazon.com!